Exam Hotspots
Six topic clusters recur across derivatives exams: put-call parity arbitrage, two-step binomial trees, Black-Scholes calculation and interpretation, margin call mechanics, basis risk in cross-hedges, and swap comparative advantage. Mastering these six families covers roughly 70 to 80 percent of typical exam marks. Each cluster has a predictable trap, so revising the traps is as important as revising the formulas.
Why it matters
Exam questions are not random. Examiners draw from a small bank of question patterns that test core mechanics. Put-call parity questions almost always include the four trade legs. Binomial trees almost always include an American check at the second-to-last node. Margin questions almost always require restoring to initial margin, not maintenance. Recognise the pattern and the marks follow.
Formulas
Worked examples
Effective price trap. A wheat exporter sells November ASX wheat futures at A$330 to hedge a November sale. At close-out the futures price is A$310 and the spot is A$315.
Basis at close is . The effective price received from the hedge equals A$335 per tonne, not A$330. Students who ignore basis post the wrong number. The hedge locks in plus the basis movement, which can be positive or negative.
Margin call trap. A trader holds a long ASX SPI 200 futures position. Initial margin is A$8,000, maintenance margin is A$6,000. After two days of losses the margin account balance falls to A$5,200.
A margin call is triggered because the balance fell below maintenance. The trader must restore the account to the initial margin of A$8,000, requiring a top-up of $8000 - 5200 = $ A$2,800, not the A$800 needed to merely reach maintenance. Restoring to maintenance is the most common exam error.
Two-step American put on a binomial tree. , , , , , strike .
Risk-neutral probability . At the upper node , the put intrinsic value is zero. At the lower node , intrinsic value is $10$ and continuation value is , so early exercise at gives $10$. Roll back to time zero, . Forgetting the early exercise check at understates the put.
Common mistakes
- ✗After a margin call, top up to the maintenance margin. Wrong. The call requires restoration to the initial margin. This is the single most-tested margin error in exam papers.
- ✗American and European calls on a non-dividend stock have different prices. They are equal because early exercise of a call on a non-dividend stock is never optimal. With dividends or for puts, early exercise can be optimal and prices differ.
- ✗The futures price equals the expected future spot price. The futures price equals spot plus cost of carry under no-arbitrage. The expected future spot may be higher or lower depending on whether the asset is in normal backwardation or contango.
Revision bullets
- •Parity arbitrage: identify which side is cheap, list the four trade legs
- •Binomial trees: backward induction with early-exercise checks for American
- •BSM: compute , , look up , apply formula
- •Margin calls: restore to initial margin, not maintenance
- •Basis risk: effective price equals at close-out
- •Swaps: split the comparative advantage gain across both parties
- •American call on non-dividend stock equals European
Quick check
The most common exam mistake on margin call questions is:
Which statement about American versus European calls is correct?
Connected topics
In learning paths
Sources
- Hull, John C. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. 11th ed. Pearson, 2022. ISBN 978-0-13-693997-9.Covers margin (Ch. 2), basis risk (Ch. 3), put-call parity and binomial trees (Chs. 11, 13), BSM (Ch. 15), and swaps (Ch. 7).
- Hull, John C. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. 11th ed. Pearson, 2022.Proves that early exercise of an American call on a non-dividend stock is never optimal.
- Australian Securities Exchange. ASX 24 margining and clearing guidelines. ASX, accessed 2026.Local reference for initial and maintenance margin requirements on ASX 24 contracts.
- Black, F. and Scholes, M. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 3, 1973, pp. 637-654.Original derivation of the BSM formula tested in nearly every introductory derivatives exam.