Skip to content
DP
Required Returnsbeginner

Hurdle Rates and Investment Policy

A hurdle rate is the minimum required return a project must clear before a firm will fund it, the threshold the project’s internal rate of return (IRR) must exceed. In the simplest case the hurdle equals the relevant cost of capital. The logic is direct. If the hurdle is 10 percent and a project promises only 8 percent, management rejects it. Firms sometimes set the hurdle above the cost of capital on purpose, to leave a margin of safety, to ration scarce capital, or to counter optimistic forecasts from project sponsors.

Why it matters

The hurdle rate is the bar a project has to jump. Set it at the cost of capital and you accept any project that creates value in present-value terms. Set it higher and you deliberately demand more, which screens out marginal projects and offsets the well-known tendency of sponsors to oversell their numbers. There is a tension. A hurdle that is too high rejects genuinely good projects, while one that is too low waves through value destroyers. The IRR rule ties back to the NPV rule. Clearing the hurdle is the IRR-side statement of a positive NPV at that discount rate, under the simple one-criterion view.

Formulas

The accept rule
Accept ifIRR≥hurdle rate\text{Accept if} \quad IRR \geq \text{hurdle rate}
In the simplest framing the hurdle equals the project’s cost of capital. Clearing it is equivalent to a non-negative NPV when the project is discounted at that rate, holding to a single decision criterion.
Hurdle rate with a deliberate premium
Hurdle rate=rproject+premium\text{Hurdle rate} = r_{project} + \text{premium}
Some firms add a premium above the risk-matched cost of capital to ration capital or to counter optimistic projections and selection bias. Too large a premium rejects good projects.

Worked examples

Scenario

A company sets a hurdle rate of 10 percent. Project A has an IRR of 12 percent and Project B an IRR of 8 percent. Under the simple rule, which clears the hurdle, and what is the risk of setting the hurdle much higher, say 16 percent?

Solution

Project A’s 12 percent IRR exceeds the 10 percent hurdle, so it clears and may be funded. Project B’s 8 percent IRR falls short, so it is rejected. Raising the hurdle to 16 percent would now reject Project A as well, even though it earns above the firm’s cost of capital. That is the danger of an inflated hurdle. It guards against optimistic forecasts but, set too high, it turns away genuinely value-creating projects.

Common mistakes

  • ✗The hurdle rate is always exactly the cost of capital. In the base case it is, but firms often set it above the cost of capital on purpose, to ration capital or counter forecast bias.
  • ✗A higher hurdle rate is always more prudent. Set too high, it rejects positive-NPV projects. The hurdle must balance discipline against missed opportunities.
  • ✗Clearing the hurdle guarantees a good investment. The IRR rule used alone ignores scale, timing and multiple-IRR problems. This is the simplest view, not the whole story.
  • ✗One firm hurdle suits every project. Like the firm WACC, a single hurdle ignores risk differences. A high-risk project should face a higher hurdle than a safe one.

Revision bullets

  • •A hurdle rate is the minimum return a project must clear to be funded
  • •The project’s IRR must be at least the hurdle rate
  • •In the base case the hurdle equals the relevant cost of capital
  • •Firms may set the hurdle above the cost of capital to ration capital or curb optimism
  • •A 10 percent hurdle rejects an 8 percent project
  • •A hurdle set too high rejects genuinely value-creating projects

Quick check

A hurdle rate is best defined as

A firm deliberately sets its hurdle rate well above its cost of capital. A key drawback of this policy is that it

Connected topics

WACCProject vs Firm RateDivisional WACCProject Risk RateWACC Fallacy

Sources

  1. Titman & Martin, Ch. 5
    Titman, S. & Martin, J. D. Valuation: The Art and Science of Corporate Investment Decisions. Pearson.
    Chapter on required returns. The hurdle-rate definition, the accept rule and the use of a high hurdle as an incentive follow this text.
  2. Graham & Harvey (2001)
    Graham, J. R. & Harvey, C. R. "The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field." Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 2001, pp. 187-243.
    Field evidence on how firms set hurdle rates and discount rates in practice.
How to cite this page
Dr. Phil's Quant Lab. (2026). Hurdle Rates and Investment Policy. Derivatives Atlas. https://phucnguyenvan.com/concept/sabv-hurdle-rates
← Back to the atlasSee in the network →