Valuing a Stock: Dividends and Gordon Growth
A share is worth the present value of the dividends it will pay. The one-period and generalized dividend models say this directly, and the Gordon growth model gives a clean closed form when dividends grow at a constant rate below the required return.
Try it yourself
A share is the present value of its future dividends. With constant growth P₀ = D₁ / (kₑ − g). Watch the price blow up as growth g climbs toward the required return kₑ: the denominator shrinks to zero, so value gets extremely sensitive to the growth assumption.
Why it matters
Owning a share is owning a claim on a future cash stream, so the same discounting that prices a bond prices a stock. When dividends grow steadily, the whole infinite stream collapses into one simple expression.
Formulas
Worked examples
A stock will pay a $2 dividend next year, the required return is 8%, and dividends grow at 3%. Value it, then raise growth to 4%.
Gordon gives P = 2 / (0.08 - 0.03) = $40. Raising growth to 4% gives P = 2 / (0.08 - 0.04) = $50, which shows how sensitive value is to the growth assumption.
Common mistakes
- ✗A stock is worth its current dividend or earnings. It is worth the present value of all future dividends, not a single year’s payout.
- ✗The Gordon model works for any growth rate. It needs the required return to exceed growth. If growth meets or beats the required return, the formula breaks down.
Revision bullets
- •A share equals the present value of future dividends
- •Gordon growth model:
- •Requires the required return above the growth rate
- •Value is very sensitive to the growth assumption
Quick check
In the Gordon growth model, raising the assumed dividend growth rate (still below the required return)
Connected topics
Sources
- Mishkin (2018), Ch. 7Mishkin, F. S. The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. 12th ed. Pearson, 2018. ISBN 978-1-292-26885-9.The one-period, generalized-dividend, and Gordon growth models of stock valuation.