Skip to content
Relative valuation by multiples

Value a company off comparable peers. Take the medianpeer multiple and apply it to the target's own fundamental. EV multiples give an enterprise value, so you bridge to equity by subtracting net debt. Equity multiples (P/E, P/S) give the share price directly.

Implied value per share$20.28
8.5xPeer 19.2xPeer 214.0xPeer 3median 9.2xEV $1104.0m− net debt $90.0mEquity $1014.0m= $20.28/shEV → equity bridgePeer EV/EBITDA (x)
Median EV/EBITDA 9.2xMean (for contrast) 10.6x
Peer EV/EBITDA multiples (x)
Peer 18.5x
Peer 29.2x
Peer 314.0x
Target EBITDA$120.0m
Net debt$90.0m
Shares outstanding50m
Median EV/EBITDA 9.2x × EBITDA $120.0m gives an enterprise value of $1104.0m. Subtract net debt $90.0m for equity $1014.0m, then divide by shares for $20.28 per share.
Try this

Cheap vs rich peers move the implied value a long way — the multiple imports the peer set's pricing. Then flip to P/E: an equity multiple lands on price directly, with no net-debt bridge.

Match the numerator to the denominator. EV/EBITDA is capital-structure-neutral, so an enterprise-value numerator must sit over a pre-interest measure such as EBITDA. Never pair EV with net income, which is already after interest. P/E and P/S are equity multiples and land on the share price directly.

Reflect: the median resists a single rich or distressed peer that would drag the mean. But every multiple inherits whatever mispricing sits in the comp set. When would you trust a multiple over a full discounted-cash-flow valuation, and when not?

Comparable Companies AnalysisOpen in Dr Phil's Quant Lab ↗