Skip to content

Prediction and Prediction Intervals

Regression supports two distinct forecasts. One is the mean outcome E(yx)E(y\mid x) at given regressor values, the other an individual outcome for a new unit. The interval for a single new yy is wider than the confidence interval for the mean, because it adds the irreducible error variance σ2\sigma^2 on top of the uncertainty in the estimated coefficients. Predictions far outside the sample range of the regressors are unreliable.

Why it matters

Estimating where the regression line sits at a point is easier than guessing one person’s actual value, since individuals scatter around the line. So a prediction interval for a new observation has to be padded for that personal randomness. And the model has no warrant once you extrapolate beyond the data it learned from.

Before you read on — recall

Why is the prediction interval for a single new outcome wider than the confidence interval for the mean at the same xx?

Formulas

Confidence interval for the mean
y^0±cse(y^0)\hat{y}^0 \pm c\cdot\mathrm{se}(\hat{y}^0)
Captures uncertainty in the estimated regression function at x=x0x=x^0.
Prediction interval for a new outcome
y^0±cse(y^0)2+σ^2\hat{y}^0 \pm c\cdot\sqrt{\mathrm{se}(\hat{y}^0)^2+\hat{\sigma}^2}
Adds σ^2\hat{\sigma}^2 for the individual error, so it is wider.

Worked examples

Scenario

Using `regress lwage educ exper`, you predict log wage for a worker with 16 years of school and 5 of experience.

Solution

In Stata, `margins, at(educ=16 exper=5)` gives the mean prediction with its confidence interval, while a prediction interval for one such worker is wider because it also carries σ^2\hat{\sigma}^2. The point estimate is the same; only the band differs.

NotePredicting log wage and then exponentiating needs a retransformation adjustment for the mean of the level.

Common mistakes

  • Using the confidence interval for the mean as the interval for a single new outcome. The individual interval is wider by the error variance σ2\sigma^2.
  • Believing prediction intervals shrink toward zero width as nn\to\infty. They converge to a positive width set by the irreducible error, not to zero.
  • Trusting predictions far outside the sample range. Extrapolation assumes the fitted relationship holds where there are no data, which is rarely safe.
  • Forgetting the retransformation issue when the model is in logs. Exponentiating the log prediction underestimates the mean level without a correction.

Revision bullets

  • Distinguish predicting the mean E(yx)E(y\mid x) from predicting a single new yy.
  • The prediction interval for a new outcome is wider, adding σ2\sigma^2.
  • Individual prediction intervals do not shrink to zero as nn grows.
  • Extrapolation beyond the sample range of the regressors is unreliable.
  • Log-model predictions need a retransformation adjustment for the level mean.

Quick check

Why is the prediction interval for a single new outcome wider than the confidence interval for the mean at the same xx?

As the sample size grows very large, the width of a prediction interval for a single new outcome:

Connected topics

More in Multiple Regression & Inference

Sources

  1. Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, Ch. 6
    Wooldridge (2019), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 7th ed., Sec. 6.4 (prediction and prediction intervals)
  2. Hill, Griffiths & Lim, Ch. 4
    Hill, Griffiths & Lim (2018), Principles of Econometrics, 5th ed., Ch. 4
How to cite this page
Dr. Phil's Quant Lab. (2026). Prediction and Prediction Intervals. Derivatives Atlas. https://phucnguyenvan.com/concept/efm-prediction-intervals
Next concept
Confidence Intervals for Coefficients
Built by Dr. Phuc V. Nguyen ·Follow on LinkedInWork with PhilEmail