Minimum Variance Hedge Ratio

The minimum-variance hedge ratio hh^* is the proportion of the spot exposure to be hedged with futures that minimises the variance of the hedged position. It equals h=ρσS/σFh^* = \rho\,\sigma_S / \sigma_F, where ρ\rho is the correlation between the change in the spot price and the change in the futures price, and σS\sigma_S, σF\sigma_F are their standard deviations. The result is the slope of the regression ΔS=a+hΔF+ε\Delta S = a + h\,\Delta F + \varepsilon, and the regression R2=ρ2R^2 = \rho^2 measures hedge effectiveness.

Why it matters

A naive hedger sells one futures contract per unit of spot exposure. That is only optimal when the spot and the futures change by the same amount on average. If futures are twice as volatile as the spot, half as many contracts will offset the average shock. If correlation is below one, the additional uncertainty from the futures leg means the variance-minimising ratio is further reduced. The formula bundles both adjustments into a single number that can be estimated by a simple OLS regression.

Formulas

Minimum-variance hedge ratio
h=ρSF×σΔSσΔFh^* = \rho_{SF} \times \frac{\sigma_{\Delta S}}{\sigma_{\Delta F}}
Equivalently h=Cov(ΔS,ΔF)/Var(ΔF)h^* = \mathrm{Cov}(\Delta S, \Delta F) / \mathrm{Var}(\Delta F), the OLS slope from regressing spot changes on futures changes. Source: Hull (2022) §3.5.
Optimal number of futures contracts
N=h×QAQFN^* = h^* \times \frac{Q_A}{Q_F}
QAQ_A is the size of the position being hedged and QFQ_F is the size of one futures contract, both in the same units. Round to the nearest whole contract.
Hedge effectiveness
R2=ρ2R^2 = \rho^2
Fraction of variance in the hedged-position changes removed by hedging at hh^*. Reported in Ederington (1979) as the standard measure of hedge quality.

Worked examples

Scenario

An airline plans to buy 2,000,000 gallons of jet fuel in one month. Heating oil futures cover 42,000 gallons each. From historical monthly data, σΔS=0.0263\sigma_{\Delta S} = 0.0263, σΔF=0.0313\sigma_{\Delta F} = 0.0313, and ρ=0.928\rho = 0.928.

Solution

Hedge ratio h=0.928×(0.0263/0.0313)=0.7777h^* = 0.928 \times (0.0263 / 0.0313) = 0.7777. Optimal contracts N=0.7777×(2,000,000/42,000)=37.03N^* = 0.7777 \times (2{,}000{,}000 / 42{,}000) = 37.03, so the airline buys 37 heating oil futures. Hedge effectiveness R2=0.9282=0.861R^2 = 0.928^2 = 0.861, meaning 86% of jet fuel price variance is removed. This worked example follows Hull (2022) Example 3.3.

Scenario

An Australian grain trader hedges 50,000 tonnes of barley using ASX Eastern Wheat futures (50 tonnes per contract). Regression of monthly barley price changes on wheat futures changes gives h=0.85h^* = 0.85.

Solution

Optimal contracts N=0.85×(50,000/50)=850N^* = 0.85 \times (50{,}000 / 50) = 850. The trader shorts 850 ASX wheat futures. With hh^* implying a correlation around 0.85 to 0.90 depending on volatilities, hedging effectiveness lies in the 70 to 80 percent range. The remaining variance is barley-specific basis risk.

Common mistakes

  • The hedge ratio is always one. h=1h^* = 1 only when ρ=1\rho = 1 and σS=σF\sigma_S = \sigma_F. In every other case, the optimal ratio differs from unity. The naive 1:1 hedge typically over-hedges or under-hedges and leaves more variance in the portfolio.
  • A high correlation is sufficient. Hedge quality also depends on the relative volatilities. Two assets with ρ=0.99\rho = 0.99 but very different volatility scales still need a non-trivial hh^* to balance dollar exposures.
  • The ratio is constant over time. Volatilities and correlations vary with market conditions. Hull (2022) recommends **re-estimating hh^*** when the regression window shifts substantially or when the market regime changes.

Revision bullets

  • **h=ρσS/σFh^* = \rho\,\sigma_S / \sigma_F** minimises hedged variance
  • Equals the OLS slope of ΔS\Delta S on ΔF\Delta F
  • Optimal contracts N=h×QA/QFN^* = h^* \times Q_A / Q_F
  • h=1h^* = 1 only when ρ=1\rho = 1 and equal volatilities
  • Hedge effectiveness R2=ρ2R^2 = \rho^2
  • Re-estimate when market regimes shift

Quick check

If ρ=1.0\rho = 1.0 and σS=σF\sigma_S = \sigma_F, the minimum-variance hedge ratio is:

An exporter has spot exposure with σS=0.020\sigma_S = 0.020. The hedge instrument has σF=0.040\sigma_F = 0.040 and correlation ρ=0.90\rho = 0.90 with the spot. The minimum-variance hedge ratio is closest to:

Connected topics

In learning paths

Sources

  1. Hull, John C. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. 11th ed. Pearson, 2022. ISBN 978-0-13-693997-9.
    Derives $h^* = \rho\,\sigma_S / \sigma_F$, links it to the OLS regression slope, and works through the airline jet-fuel example used in our case study.
  2. Ederington, Louis H. The Hedging Performance of the New Futures Markets. Journal of Finance, Vol. 34, No. 1, March 1979, pp. 157-170.
    Foundational paper that estimated minimum-variance hedge ratios and reported hedge effectiveness as the regression $R^2$, the standard benchmark since.
  3. Johnson, Leland L. The Theory of Hedging and Speculation in Commodity Futures. Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1960, pp. 139-151.
    Earliest derivation of the minimum-variance hedge ratio in a mean-variance utility framework, predating Ederington's empirical estimation.
  4. CME Group. Hedging and Risk Management for Equity Index Futures. CME Education Centre, accessed 2026.
    Applies the minimum-variance framework to equity portfolios and discusses how to translate the ratio into contract counts.
How to cite this page
Dr. Phil's Quant Lab. (2026). Minimum Variance Hedge Ratio. Derivatives Atlas. https://phucnguyenvan.com/concept/minimum-variance-hedge-ratio